Which of the following is a requirement for aggravated battery?

Aggravated battery typically involves the intentional infliction of serious bodily harm on another person. In this context, the requirement that the defendant intentionally caused bodily harm against the victim's will is crucial. This indicates that the act was not only intentional but also done without the consent of the victim, which elevates the severity of the offense to 'aggravated.'

By focusing on the intent to harm, this option highlights the essential elements that make the act fall under aggravated battery rather than simple battery, which may involve lesser injuries or unintentional harm. The presence of intent and lack of consent are what distinguish aggravated battery from other forms of assault or battery.

The other options, while they mention relevant aspects of prosecuting battery cases, do not define the core legal requirement for aggravated battery as clearly as this one. For instance, using a deadly weapon is an important factor in many jurisdictions but does not universally define aggravated battery, as there can be cases of aggravated battery without a weapon. Intent to frighten is an aspect of some assault charges but does not apply directly to battery itself. Finally, a claim of self-defense can negate culpability entirely, meaning it would not support a charge of aggravated battery at all. Thus, the focus on intentional